You are currently browsing the Reagan Brats weblog archives for the day 21. July 2010.
21. July 2010 by ReaganBrat.
Elena Kagan is not honest.
Elena Kagan is a progressive liberal.
Elena Kagan will not defend the Constitution of the United States.
President Obama selected a nominee for the Supreme Court of the United States who is unqualified to serve on the highest court in our land. Because Elena Kagan is not qualified to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States of America, the Senate has an obligation to prevent the appointment of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Democrats in the Senate will not take their role to advise and consent Supreme Court Justices seriously. Republican Senators have an obligation to filibuster Elena Kagan to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Miss Kagan is not honest. On numerous occasions during her career and during senate confirmation hearings, Miss Kagan has failed to speak the truth. In a single day when asked if she would consider herself as open-minded or a “legal progressive” she stated, “I honestly don’t know what that label means”. However, later that day during the same hearing Miss Kagan described herself by stating, “my political views are generally progressive”. Miss Kagan told two separate contradictory stories during her confirmation hearing. Miss Kagan is not telling the truth. As most progressives Miss Kagan is trying to conceal her counter-American progressive views in order to obtain a position of power. America cannot afford more deceptive progressives obtaining positions of power.
Progressives cannot fulfill an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. They do not believe in the Constitution, nor do they seek to uphold the Constitution. Progressives are hostile or opposed to the American ideal. They subscribe to a philosophy that permits the dismissal of the Constitution. Contrary to the authors of the Constitution, contrary to the intent of the adopters of the Constitution, contrary to the American politic and contrary to the actual words of the Constitution progressives believe the law of the Constitution can be changed without changing the Constitution. In contravention of the Constitution, progressives change the legal affect of the Constitution without altering or amending the Constitution. Progressives adopt a counter-American, counter-representative legal framework in violation of our most fundamental laws including the Constitution and unlawfully apply it to our Constitution claiming the Constitution is a “living document”. As a “living document” progressives seek to alter the legal affect of the Constitution without altering the Constitution. Progressives believe their “intellectual superiority” empowers them to change the meaning of the Constitution to update the law to remain current with their view of changing moral codes and mores. They believe the text of the Constitution is no longer relevant. The Constitution is not only our nation’s legal framework. The Constitution establishes our union of states and the authority of our federal government to act on behalf of the people. Article V of the Constitution explicitly provides the only methods by which that document shall be amended. No where does the Constitution permit amendment by the Supreme Court, regardless if they claim “intellectual superiority”. Federal agents cannot fulfill any oath nor act legally under the Constitution when they alter that fundamental agreement among the states without the consent of the states or the people. Progressive Elana Kagan cannot fulfill a Constitutional oath, because her count-American philosophy prohibits protecting the Constitution.
In addition to the above mentioned disqualifying flaws, Miss Kagan demonstrates disturbing opinions. While at Harvard she banned the military from her campus. As Solicitor General Miss Kagan argued that the government could ban books and political pamphlets. During Senate hearings, Miss Kagan refused to say the government could not tell people what they could eat. Miss Kagan’s dishonest, self-proclaimed progressive counter-American philosophy, and inability to protect the written Constitution, mandate prohibition of her appointment to the Supreme Court.
Posted in General Comments | No Comments »